With life training being “The” career choice in this millennium, many of you are looking for the right choice for training and certification. Hopefully this article will answer some of your questions.

There are many good school coaches, academies and institutes. Some are accredited and some are not. Should school accreditation make a difference for you? In my opinion, no.

Because there is no universal standard for the life training profession, there is no universal standard for schools. Also, because the coaches who are paid well generally work in a niche, the niche in such a way that they are developed by coaches independently of whatever training they might receive.

What makes accreditation problems that are very confusing is marketing. Accreditation is being used as a marketing tool in some cases, not as a barometer of their success. Many accredited coaching schools only because a group of colleagues gathered and decided to Career & Entrepreneurial Clarity form a group and resulted in their colleague’s schools. How do you know if this is the problem for the school you are interested in? You really don’t know and generally can’t find out.

Many schools use accreditation as marketing tactics to attract you and charge exorbitant tariffs. If you just want to spend more money, please. Prices really have nothing to do with the effectiveness of the material. Middle school generally works harder to please students and offers good or better training in many cases, because students get more once with instructors.

How important is school accreditation? Let’s put it in a realistic perspective. What is most important for prospective coaching clients, can this coach help me? Most clients see whether a coach has a formal coach training, but not to the background of the school. And the truth is, the client does not care whether the school you attend, is accredited. It doesn’t appear. The client will decide to use your service if they like you, feel the connection, and see that you offer the solutions they need. That’s pretty much.

Because coaching is a different and relatively new profession, and there is no universal standard, many new schools have emerged. To build a fence around the training and income community originating from it, several schools form organizations to accredit only their chosen schools and make it almost impossible for newer schools to become accredited. They will mandate the Petitioner’s school to show evidence of ten years or more professional success, before they even consider them to accreditation. Then, they apply a personal bias to grow the school, so unless the school matches their philosophy, they do not meet the requirements or will not be approved.

Peer Resources (http://www.peer.ca/coachingschools.html), a world leader recognized in coach training resources stated “accreditation” in the field of coaching today has a number of disturbing aspects, including a lack of broad acceptance. , conflicts of interest between reviewers and several rated schools, minimal reporting results, and questionable or unclear criteria. While accreditation usually means schools have been reviewed by external sources, that does not mean that “non-accredited schools” provide fewer values ​​or worse quality programs. “

The truth about school training school accreditation